You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Diabetes and the Kidney in Human and Veterinary Medicine
|
---|---|
Published in |
Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice, March 2013
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.cvsm.2012.11.002 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Carly Anne Bloom, Jacquie S. Rand |
Abstract |
Diabetic nephropathy is a well-recognized clinical consequence of both type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus in humans. Major risk factors include poor glycemic control, hypertension, and microalbuminuria, as well as genetic factors. In both type 1 and 2 diabetics with nephropathy, structural changes occur in the kidneys before overt clinical disease. Studies suggest that some of the risk factors and structural renal changes of human diabetes also exist in diabetic dogs and cats. This article assembles existing information on the presence of risk factors, laboratory and histologic findings, and consequences of human diabetic nephropathy as applied to cats. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 2 | 2% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Saint Kitts and Nevis | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 113 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 23 | 20% |
Researcher | 14 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 12% |
Student > Master | 12 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
Other | 25 | 21% |
Unknown | 21 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 42 | 36% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 32% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 8% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | <1% |
Other | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 24 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2013.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice
#853
of 1,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,226
of 206,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice
#10
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,082 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,318 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.