↓ Skip to main content

Neural Mechanisms of Positive Mood Induced Modulation of Reality Monitoring

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neural Mechanisms of Positive Mood Induced Modulation of Reality Monitoring
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, November 2016
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00581
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karuna Subramaniam, Jeevit Gill, Patrick Slattery, Aditi Shastri, Daniel H. Mathalon, Srikantan Nagarajan, Sophia Vinogradov

Abstract

This study investigates the neural mechanisms of mood induced modulation of cognition, specifically, on reality monitoring abilities. Reality monitoring is the ability to accurately distinguish the source of self-generated information from externally-presented contextual information. When participants were in a positive mood, compared to a neutral mood, they significantly improved their source memory identification abilities, particularly for self-generated information. However, being in a negative mood had no effect on reality monitoring abilities. Additionally, when participants were in a positive mood state, they showed activation in several regions that predisposed them to perform better at reality monitoring. Specifically, positive mood induced activity within the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) was associated with improvements in subsequent identification of self-generated information, and positive mood induced activation within the striatum (putamen) facilitated better identification of externally-presented information. These findings indicate that regions within mPFC, PCC and striatum are sensitive to positive mood-cognition enhancing effects that enable participants to be better prepared for subsequent reality monitoring decision-making.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 44 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 27%
Researcher 8 18%
Student > Master 4 9%
Professor 3 7%
Other 3 7%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 10 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 13 29%
Neuroscience 6 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 12 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2017.
All research outputs
#15,354,029
of 24,340,143 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#4,744
of 7,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,118
of 311,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#112
of 163 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,340,143 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,459 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,061 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 163 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.