↓ Skip to main content

マイクロビーズ製クッション上での臥位が脳卒中後片麻痺患者に及ぼす即時効果

Overview of attention for article published in Rigakuryoho Kagaku, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
マイクロビーズ製クッション上での臥位が脳卒中後片麻痺患者に及ぼす即時効果
Published in
Rigakuryoho Kagaku, January 2016
DOI 10.1589/rika.31.495
Authors

Tadamitsu MATSUDA, Yasuaki KUSUMOTO, Hiromi SAKAI, Kouichi ITO, Miki TAGAMI, Noriyuki ABE, Ryousuke SEKI, Nobuo HONDO, Yuuto YAMAZAKI, Yuuya AKAIKE, Atushi NIHEI, Osamu NITTA

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2016.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Rigakuryoho Kagaku
#269
of 291 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#341,828
of 399,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rigakuryoho Kagaku
#22
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 291 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,677 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.