↓ Skip to main content

Enablers and barriers in providing telediabetes services for Indigenous communities: A systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Enablers and barriers in providing telediabetes services for Indigenous communities: A systematic review
Published in
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, October 2016
DOI 10.1177/1357633x16673267
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sumudu I Wickramasinghe, Liam J Caffery, Natalie K Bradford, Anthony C Smith

Abstract

A systematic review of studies which reported on telediabetes services within Indigenous communities was undertaken in June 2016. The aim of this study was to identify enablers and barriers associated with the delivery of telehealth services for diabetes care amongst Indigenous people. A total of 14 articles met the study inclusion criteria, reporting work in Canada, Australia, India, and the US. Key enablers included the use of cultural and spiritual elements, acknowledgement of local beliefs and traditions, and appropriate community engagement. The involvement of Indigenous health workers was also very important because of their role in communication in local language, helping clinicians understand the community, and the transportation of patients. The main barriers associated with telediabetes services were the potentially high fail-to-attend rates, lack of technical skills associated with the operation of telehealth equipment, and the lack of availability of local staff. Knowledge of the enablers and barriers associated with the delivery of healthcare services to Indigenous communities is important when planning a telediabetes service.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 122 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 12%
Researcher 12 10%
Student > Master 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 10%
Other 10 8%
Other 24 20%
Unknown 38 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 22 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 14%
Social Sciences 9 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 3%
Other 22 18%
Unknown 44 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2020.
All research outputs
#4,117,020
of 23,510,717 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
#204
of 1,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,885
of 314,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
#15
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,510,717 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,218 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,371 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.