↓ Skip to main content

A Systematic Review of Financial Toxicity Among Cancer Survivors: We Can’t Pay the Co-Pay

Overview of attention for article published in The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
355 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
216 Mendeley
Title
A Systematic Review of Financial Toxicity Among Cancer Survivors: We Can’t Pay the Co-Pay
Published in
The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, October 2016
DOI 10.1007/s40271-016-0204-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Louisa G. Gordon, Katharina M. D. Merollini, Anthony Lowe, Raymond J. Chan

Abstract

To determine the extent of financial toxicity (FT) among cancer survivors, identify the determinants and how FT is measured. A systematic review was performed in MEDLINE, CINAHL and PsycINFO, using relevant terminology and included articles published from 1 January, 2013 to 30 June, 2016. We included observational studies where the primary outcomes included FT and study samples were greater than 200. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed. From 417 citations, a total of 25 studies were included in this review. Seventy outcomes of FT were reported with 47 covering monetary, objective and subjective indicators of FT. A total of 28-48% of patients reported FT using monetary measures and 16-73% using subjective measures. The most commonly reported factors associated with FT were: being female, younger age, low income at baseline, adjuvant therapies and more recent diagnosis. Relative to non-cancer comparison groups, cancer survivors experienced significantly higher FT. Most studies were cross-sectional and causal inferences between FT and determinants were not possible. Measures of FT were varied and most were not validated, while monetary values of out-of-pocket expenses included different cost components across studies. A substantial proportion of cancer survivors experience financial hardship irrespective of how it is measured. Using standardised outcomes and longitudinal designs to measure FT would improve determination of the extent of FT. Further research is recommended on reduced work participation and income losses occurring concurrently with FT and on the impacts on treatment non-adherence.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 216 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 11%
Student > Master 24 11%
Student > Postgraduate 23 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Other 50 23%
Unknown 61 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 12%
Social Sciences 10 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 9 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 3%
Other 35 16%
Unknown 76 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2021.
All research outputs
#2,886,275
of 23,999,200 outputs
Outputs from The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
#88
of 549 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,869
of 315,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,999,200 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 549 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,993 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.