↓ Skip to main content

Ranibizumab: A Review of Its Use in the Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Overview of attention for article published in Drugs & Aging, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
Ranibizumab: A Review of Its Use in the Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Published in
Drugs & Aging, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/s40266-013-0077-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

James E. Frampton

Abstract

Ranibizumab (Lucentis(®)), an inhibitor of all vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) A isoforms, is approved for the intravitreal treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). In pivotal trials, monthly injections of ranibizumab were superior to verteporfin photodynamic therapy in the treatment of predominantly classic choroidal neovascularization (CNV) due to neovascular AMD (ANCHOR) and sham in the treatment of minimally classic or occult CNV due to neovascular AMD (MARINA). Monthly or less frequent injections of ranibizumab are generally well tolerated and associated with low rates of ocular and systemic serious adverse events (SAEs). Less frequent dosing has been evaluated with the aim of reducing the burden, risk and cost of monthly injections. In the landmark CATT trial, monthly monitoring and retreatment as-needed with ranibizumab was equivalent to monthly treatment in terms of the vision gain at 1 year, but reduced the number of injections (and the related cost) by approximately one-half. In head-to-head comparisons, aflibercept administered bimonthly was noninferior to ranibizumab administered monthly (VIEW 1 and 2), bevacizumab administered monthly was equivalent to ranibizumab administered monthly (CATT), and bevacizumab administered as-needed was equivalent to ranibizumab administered as-needed (CATT). Bevacizumab is widely used (off-label) for economic reasons; while it was less costly than ranibizumab, it was associated with more systemic SAEs. Notwithstanding the availability of other similarly effective anti-VEGF therapies that are approved (aflibercept) or unapproved (bevacizumab), ranibizumab continues to set the standard as regards the totality of evidence from randomized clinical trials demonstrating its efficacy and tolerability (particularly that of the monthly regimen) in the treatment of neovascular AMD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Iceland 1 1%
Unknown 75 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 19%
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Other 5 6%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 17 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 21 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2013.
All research outputs
#17,683,485
of 22,703,044 outputs
Outputs from Drugs & Aging
#1,024
of 1,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,071
of 198,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drugs & Aging
#14
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,703,044 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,192 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,759 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.