↓ Skip to main content

Artificial neural networks for breathing and snoring episode detection in sleep sounds

Overview of attention for article published in Physiological Measurement, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Artificial neural networks for breathing and snoring episode detection in sleep sounds
Published in
Physiological Measurement, September 2012
DOI 10.1088/0967-3334/33/10/1675
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takahiro Emoto, Udantha R Abeyratne, Yongjian Chen, Ikuji Kawata, Masatake Akutagawa, Yohsuke Kinouchi

Abstract

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a serious disorder characterized by intermittent events of upper airway collapse during sleep. Snoring is the most common nocturnal symptom of OSA. Almost all OSA patients snore, but not all snorers have the disease. Recently, researchers have attempted to develop automated snore analysis technology for the purpose of OSA diagnosis. These technologies commonly require, as the first step, the automated identification of snore/breathing episodes (SBE) in sleep sound recordings. Snore intensity may occupy a wide dynamic range (> 95 dB) spanning from the barely audible to loud sounds. Low-intensity SBE sounds are sometimes seen buried within the background noise floor, even in high-fidelity sound recordings made within a sleep laboratory. The complexity of SBE sounds makes it a challenging task to develop automated snore segmentation algorithms, especially in the presence of background noise. In this paper, we propose a fundamentally novel approach based on artificial neural network (ANN) technology to detect SBEs. Working on clinical data, we show that the proposed method can detect SBE at a sensitivity and specificity exceeding 0.892 and 0.874 respectively, even when the signal is completely buried in background noise (SNR < 0 dB). We compare the performance of the proposed technology with those of the existing methods (short-term energy, zero-crossing rates) and illustrate that the proposed method vastly outperforms conventional techniques.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 3%
Spain 1 3%
Unknown 38 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 15%
Other 3 8%
Researcher 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Other 10 25%
Unknown 12 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 13 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 15%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 13 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2013.
All research outputs
#18,333,600
of 22,703,044 outputs
Outputs from Physiological Measurement
#1,180
of 1,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,611
of 170,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physiological Measurement
#16
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,703,044 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,379 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.