| Title |
Theory-based predictors of follow-up exercise behavior after a supervised exercise intervention in older breast cancer survivors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Supportive Care in Cancer, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00520-011-1360-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul D. Loprinzi, Bradley J. Cardinal, Qi Si, Jill A. Bennett, Kerri M. Winters-Stone |
| Abstract |
Supervised exercise interventions can elicit numerous positive health outcomes in older breast cancer survivors. However, to maintain these benefits, regular exercise needs to be maintained long after the supervised program. This may be difficult, as in this transitional period (i.e., time period immediately following a supervised exercise program), breast cancer survivors are in the absence of on-site direct supervision from a trained exercise specialist. The purpose of the present study was to identify key determinants of regular exercise participation during a 6-month follow-up period after a 12-month supervised exercise program among women aged 65+ years who had completed adjuvant treatment for breast cancer. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 139 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 12% |
| Researcher | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 23 | 16% |
| Unknown | 35 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 16% |
| Sports and Recreations | 15 | 10% |
| Psychology | 12 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 12% |
| Unknown | 40 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2013.
All research outputs
#18,333,600
of 22,703,044 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#3,543
of 4,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,010
of 243,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#19
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,703,044 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,530 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,644 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.