↓ Skip to main content

Social learning in Cartilaginous fish (stingrays Potamotrygon falkneri)

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Cognition, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Social learning in Cartilaginous fish (stingrays Potamotrygon falkneri)
Published in
Animal Cognition, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10071-013-0625-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kerstin E. Thonhauser, Tamar Gutnick, Ruth A. Byrne, Karl Kral, Gordon M. Burghardt, Michael J. Kuba

Abstract

Social learning is considered one of the hallmarks of cognition. Observers learn from demonstrators that a particular behavior pattern leads to a specific consequence or outcome, which may be either positive or negative. In the last few years, social learning has been studied in a variety of taxa including birds and bony fish. To date, there are few studies demonstrating learning processes in cartilaginous fish. Our study shows that the cartilaginous fish freshwater stingrays (Potamotrygon falkneri) are capable of social learning and isolates the processes involved. Using a task that required animals to learn to remove a food reward from a tube, we found that observers needed significantly (P < 0.01) fewer trials to learn to extract the reward than demonstrators. Furthermore, observers immediately showed a significantly (P < 0.05) higher frequency of the most efficient "suck and undulation" strategy exhibited by the experienced demonstrators, suggesting imitation. Shedding light on social learning processes in cartilaginous fish advances the systematic comparison of cognition between aquatic and terrestrial vertebrates and helps unravel the evolutionary origins of social cognition.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 2%
Netherlands 1 1%
Finland 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 90 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 19%
Researcher 15 15%
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Professor 10 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 14 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 40%
Psychology 22 23%
Neuroscience 4 4%
Environmental Science 3 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 2%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 18 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2013.
All research outputs
#14,205,392
of 25,083,571 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#1,086
of 1,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,644
of 202,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#17
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,083,571 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,553 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,979 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.