↓ Skip to main content

Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
4 policy sources
twitter
15 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1281 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1968 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
Title
Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-13-48
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helena ML Daudt, Catherine van Mossel, Samantha J Scott

Abstract

Scoping studies are increasingly common for broadly searching the literature on a specific topic, yet researchers lack an agreed-upon definition of and framework for the methodology. In 2005, Arksey and O'Malley offered a methodological framework for conducting scoping studies. In their subsequent work, Levac et al. responded to Arksey and O'Malley's call for advances to their framework. Our paper builds on this collective work to further enhance the methodology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,968 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 19 <1%
United Kingdom 8 <1%
United States 4 <1%
Sweden 4 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Other 5 <1%
Unknown 1923 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 354 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 306 16%
Researcher 204 10%
Student > Bachelor 128 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 104 5%
Other 366 19%
Unknown 506 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 352 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 321 16%
Social Sciences 213 11%
Psychology 92 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 60 3%
Other 359 18%
Unknown 571 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,822,957
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#234
of 2,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,241
of 213,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#3
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,214 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.