↓ Skip to main content

Accommodative dysfunction

Overview of attention for article published in Documenta Ophthalmologica, May 1983
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
Title
Accommodative dysfunction
Published in
Documenta Ophthalmologica, May 1983
DOI 10.1007/bf00140808
Pubmed ID
Authors

K. M. Daum

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 99 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 24%
Student > Master 14 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Researcher 5 5%
Student > Postgraduate 5 5%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 26 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 24%
Physics and Astronomy 4 4%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 31 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2017.
All research outputs
#18,480,433
of 22,899,952 outputs
Outputs from Documenta Ophthalmologica
#321
of 458 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,860
of 8,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Documenta Ophthalmologica
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,899,952 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 458 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 8,196 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them