| Title |
Chemical Composition of Precloacal Secretions of Two Liolaemus fabiani Populations: Are They Different?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Chemical Ecology, March 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1022858919037 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Claudio M. Escobar, Carlos A. Escobar, Antonieta Labra, Hermann M. Niemeyer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 6% |
| Chile | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 42 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 19% |
| Researcher | 9 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 7 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 51% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 11% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2021.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Chemical Ecology
#686
of 2,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,141
of 62,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Chemical Ecology
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,540 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.