↓ Skip to main content

Author disambiguation using multi-aspect similarity indicators

Overview of attention for article published in Scientometrics, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Author disambiguation using multi-aspect similarity indicators
Published in
Scientometrics, December 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11192-011-0589-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Gurney, Edwin Horlings, Peter van den Besselaar

Abstract

Key to accurate bibliometric analyses is the ability to correctly link individuals to their corpus of work, with an optimal balance between precision and recall. We have developed an algorithm that does this disambiguation task with a very high recall and precision. The method addresses the issues of discarded records due to null data fields and their resultant effect on recall, precision and F-measure results. We have implemented a dynamic approach to similarity calculations based on all available data fields. We have also included differences in author contribution and age difference between publications, both of which have meaningful effects on overall similarity measurements, resulting in significantly higher recall and precision of returned records. The results are presented from a test dataset of heterogeneous catalysis publications. Results demonstrate significantly high average F-measure scores and substantial improvements on previous and stand-alone techniques.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
France 1 2%
Guatemala 1 2%
Peru 1 2%
Japan 1 2%
Unknown 49 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Librarian 5 9%
Student > Master 5 9%
Other 4 7%
Other 12 22%
Unknown 8 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 12 22%
Computer Science 12 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 10 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2013.
All research outputs
#14,621,823
of 22,703,044 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#1,905
of 2,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,892
of 243,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#13
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,703,044 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,666 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,707 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.