↓ Skip to main content

Associative memory of phase-coded spatiotemporal patterns in leaky Integrate and Fire networks

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Computational Neuroscience, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
Title
Associative memory of phase-coded spatiotemporal patterns in leaky Integrate and Fire networks
Published in
Journal of Computational Neuroscience, October 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10827-012-0423-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Silvia Scarpetta, Ferdinando Giacco

Abstract

We study the collective dynamics of a Leaky Integrate and Fire network in which precise relative phase relationship of spikes among neurons are stored, as attractors of the dynamics, and selectively replayed at different time scales. Using an STDP-based learning process, we store in the connectivity several phase-coded spike patterns, and we find that, depending on the excitability of the network, different working regimes are possible, with transient or persistent replay activity induced by a brief signal. We introduce an order parameter to evaluate the similarity between stored and recalled phase-coded pattern, and measure the storage capacity. Modulation of spiking thresholds during replay changes the frequency of the collective oscillation or the number of spikes per cycle, keeping preserved the phases relationship. This allows a coding scheme in which phase, rate and frequency are dissociable. Robustness with respect to noise and heterogeneity of neurons parameters is studied, showing that, since dynamics is a retrieval process, neurons preserve stable precise phase relationship among units, keeping a unique frequency of oscillation, even in noisy conditions and with heterogeneity of internal parameters of the units.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 5%
United States 2 5%
United Kingdom 1 3%
Belarus 1 3%
Germany 1 3%
Unknown 32 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 21%
Researcher 8 21%
Student > Master 6 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 2 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 8 21%
Physics and Astronomy 8 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 18%
Engineering 5 13%
Computer Science 3 8%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 2 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2013.
All research outputs
#18,333,600
of 22,703,044 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Computational Neuroscience
#222
of 306 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,936
of 172,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Computational Neuroscience
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,703,044 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 306 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.