↓ Skip to main content

Potential of non-traditional isotope studies for bioarchaeology

Overview of attention for article published in Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
Title
Potential of non-traditional isotope studies for bioarchaeology
Published in
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, November 2016
DOI 10.1007/s12520-016-0426-9
Authors

Klervia Jaouen, Marie-Laure Pons

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 105 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 24%
Student > Master 19 18%
Researcher 14 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 22 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 25 23%
Social Sciences 15 14%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 13 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 7%
Chemistry 6 6%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 28 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2016.
All research outputs
#3,947,559
of 24,495,755 outputs
Outputs from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#249
of 895 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,040
of 316,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#4
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,495,755 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 895 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,839 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.