↓ Skip to main content

Selecting focal species as surrogates for imperiled species using relative sensitivities derived from occupancy analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Indicators, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Selecting focal species as surrogates for imperiled species using relative sensitivities derived from occupancy analysis
Published in
Ecological Indicators, February 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.09.043
Authors

Amy L. Silvano, Craig Guyer, Todd D. Steury, James B. Grand

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 16%
Researcher 7 16%
Student > Master 7 16%
Student > Bachelor 6 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 6 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 44%
Environmental Science 12 28%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Linguistics 1 2%
Neuroscience 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2016.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Indicators
#2,942
of 3,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#322,737
of 424,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Indicators
#62
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,567 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,905 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.