↓ Skip to main content

Ryanodine-induced vasoconstriction of the gerbil spiral modiolar artery depends on the Ca2+ sensitivity but not on Ca2+ sparks or BK channels

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Physiology, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Ryanodine-induced vasoconstriction of the gerbil spiral modiolar artery depends on the Ca2+ sensitivity but not on Ca2+ sparks or BK channels
Published in
BMC Physiology, November 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12899-016-0026-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gayathri Krishnamoorthy, Katrin Reimann, Philine Wangemann

Abstract

In many vascular smooth muscle cells (SMCs), ryanodine receptor-mediated Ca(2+) sparks activate large-conductance Ca(2+)-activated K(+) (BK) channels leading to lowered SMC [Ca(2+)]i and vasodilation. Here we investigated whether Ca(2+) sparks regulate SMC global [Ca(2+)]i and diameter in the spiral modiolar artery (SMA) by activating BK channels. SMAs were isolated from adult female gerbils, loaded with the Ca(2+)-sensitive flourescent dye fluo-4 and pressurized using a concentric double-pipette system. Ca(2+) signals and vascular diameter changes were recorded using a laser-scanning confocal imaging system. Effects of various pharmacological agents on Ca(2+) signals and vascular diameter were analyzed. Ca(2+) sparks and waves were observed in pressurized SMAs. Inhibition of Ca(2+) sparks with ryanodine increased global Ca(2+) and constricted SMA at 40 cmH2O but inhibition of Ca(2+) sparks with tetracaine or inhibition of BK channels with iberiotoxin at 40 cmH2O did not produce a similar effect. The ryanodine-induced vasoconstriction observed at 40 cmH2O was abolished at 60 cmH2O, consistent with a greater Ca(2+)-sensitivity of constriction at 40 cmH2O than at 60 cmH2O. When the Ca(2+)-sensitivity of the SMA was increased by prior application of 1 nM endothelin-1, ryanodine induced a robust vasoconstriction at 60 cmH2O. The results suggest that Ca(2+) sparks, while present, do not regulate vascular diameter in the SMA by activating BK channels and that the regulation of vascular diameter in the SMA is determined by the Ca(2+)-sensitivity of constriction.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 1 25%
Engineering 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2016.
All research outputs
#21,264,673
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Physiology
#69
of 78 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#272,791
of 314,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Physiology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 78 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,150 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them