| Title |
Vascular depression consensus report – a critical update
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, November 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12916-016-0720-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Howard J. Aizenstein, Andrius Baskys, Maura Boldrini, Meryl A. Butters, Breno S. Diniz, Manoj Kumar Jaiswal, Kurt A. Jellinger, Lev S. Kruglov, Ivan A. Meshandin, Milija D. Mijajlovic, Guenter Niklewski, Sarah Pospos, Keerthy Raju, Kneginja Richter, David C. Steffens, Warren D. Taylor, Oren Tene |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 14% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 57% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 21% |
| Scientists | 2 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 234 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 232 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 11% |
| Researcher | 22 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 46 | 20% |
| Unknown | 74 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 23% |
| Psychology | 41 | 18% |
| Neuroscience | 29 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 8% |
| Unknown | 84 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,921,204
of 25,743,152 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,866
of 4,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,697
of 318,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#38
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,743,152 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,572 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.