You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Functional Genomics Approach to Understand Variation in Cytokine Production in Humans
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cell, November 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cell.2016.10.017 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yang Li, Marije Oosting, Sanne P. Smeekens, Martin Jaeger, Raul Aguirre-Gamboa, Kieu T.T. Le, Patrick Deelen, Isis Ricaño-Ponce, Teske Schoffelen, Anne F.M. Jansen, Morris A. Swertz, Sebo Withoff, Esther van de Vosse, Marcel van Deuren, Frank van de Veerdonk, Alexandra Zhernakova, Jos W.M. van der Meer, Ramnik J. Xavier, Lude Franke, Leo A.B. Joosten, Cisca Wijmenga, Vinod Kumar, Mihai G. Netea |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 26% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 14% |
| Germany | 3 | 5% |
| Canada | 3 | 5% |
| France | 2 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 4% |
| El Salvador | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 14 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 32 | 56% |
| Scientists | 19 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 493 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 476 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 115 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 103 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 7% |
| Professor | 28 | 6% |
| Other | 91 | 18% |
| Unknown | 86 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 103 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 103 | 21% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 71 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 56 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 37 | 8% |
| Unknown | 114 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 94. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2023.
All research outputs
#458,027
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cell
#2,361
of 17,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,747
of 322,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell
#52
of 165 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 59.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 165 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.