↓ Skip to main content

Evidence of Gene–Environment Interactions between Common Breast Cancer Susceptibility Loci and Established Environmental Risk Factors

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Genetics, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
140 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
218 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evidence of Gene–Environment Interactions between Common Breast Cancer Susceptibility Loci and Established Environmental Risk Factors
Published in
PLoS Genetics, March 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003284
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefan Nickels, Thérèse Truong, Rebecca Hein, Kristen Stevens, Katharina Buck, Sabine Behrens, Ursula Eilber, Martina Schmidt, Lothar Häberle, Alina Vrieling, Mia Gaudet, Jonine Figueroa, Nils Schoof, Amanda B. Spurdle, Anja Rudolph, Peter A. Fasching, John L. Hopper, Enes Makalic, Daniel F. Schmidt, Melissa C. Southey, Matthias W. Beckmann, Arif B. Ekici, Olivia Fletcher, Lorna Gibson, Isabel dos Santos Silva, Julian Peto, Manjeet K. Humphreys, Jean Wang, Emilie Cordina-Duverger, Florence Menegaux, Børge G. Nordestgaard, Stig E. Bojesen, Charlotte Lanng, Hoda Anton-Culver, Argyrios Ziogas, Leslie Bernstein, Christina A. Clarke, Hermann Brenner, Heiko Müller, Volker Arndt, Christa Stegmaier, Hiltrud Brauch, Thomas Brüning, Volker Harth, The GENICA Network, Arto Mannermaa, Vesa Kataja, Veli-Matti Kosma, Jaana M. Hartikainen, kConFab, AOCS Management Group, Diether Lambrechts, Dominiek Smeets, Patrick Neven, Robert Paridaens, Dieter Flesch-Janys, Nadia Obi, Shan Wang-Gohrke, Fergus J. Couch, Janet E. Olson, Celine M. Vachon, Graham G. Giles, Gianluca Severi, Laura Baglietto, Kenneth Offit, Esther M. John, Alexander Miron, Irene L. Andrulis, Julia A. Knight, Gord Glendon, Anna Marie Mulligan, Stephen J. Chanock, Jolanta Lissowska, Jianjun Liu, Angela Cox, Helen Cramp, Dan Connley, Sabapathy Balasubramanian, Alison M. Dunning, Mitul Shah, Amy Trentham-Dietz, Polly Newcomb, Linda Titus, Kathleen Egan, Elizabeth K. Cahoon, Preetha Rajaraman, Alice J. Sigurdson, Michele M. Doody, Pascal Guénel, Paul D. P. Pharoah, Marjanka K. Schmidt, Per Hall, Doug F. Easton, Montserrat Garcia-Closas, Roger L. Milne, Jenny Chang-Claude

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 207 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 37 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 17%
Student > Master 32 15%
Student > Bachelor 18 8%
Professor 17 8%
Other 44 20%
Unknown 34 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 12%
Computer Science 7 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 3%
Other 28 13%
Unknown 41 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2013.
All research outputs
#1,174,542
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Genetics
#848
of 9,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,586
of 214,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Genetics
#18
of 209 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,039 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 209 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.