↓ Skip to main content

Opioids and Chronic Pain: Where Is the Balance?

Overview of attention for article published in Current Oncology Reports, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 969)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
Title
Opioids and Chronic Pain: Where Is the Balance?
Published in
Current Oncology Reports, November 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11912-016-0558-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mellar P. Davis, Zankhana Mehta

Abstract

Chronic opioid therapy (defined as greater than 3 months on opioids) is a common practice for those with non-cancer pain, cancer survivors with treatment-related pain, and individuals with cancer undergoing disease-modifying therapy with a survival that can be for a year or more. Recent studies have found unique long-term toxicities with opioids which reduce the utility of opioid therapy in chronic pain. The risk of addiction, depression, central hypogonadism, sleep-disordered breathing, impaired wound healing, infections, cognitive impairment, falls, non-vertebral fractures, and mortality are increased in populations on long-term opioids. Factors associated with these risks are related to dose, duration of opioid therapy, type of opioid, and formula (long-acting, short-acting). This state-of-the-art review discusses the risks and benefits of chronic opioid therapy and strategies to increase utility and diminish risks to opioid therapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 118 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 17%
Student > Master 16 13%
Researcher 13 11%
Other 12 10%
Student > Postgraduate 8 7%
Other 30 25%
Unknown 21 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 11%
Psychology 8 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Neuroscience 6 5%
Other 27 23%
Unknown 21 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 493. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2017.
All research outputs
#51,564
of 25,008,338 outputs
Outputs from Current Oncology Reports
#2
of 969 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,098
of 318,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Oncology Reports
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,008,338 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 969 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.