↓ Skip to main content

Relationship dissatisfaction and other risk factors for future relationship dissolution: a population-based study of 18,523 couples

Overview of attention for article published in Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
twitter
8 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
Title
Relationship dissatisfaction and other risk factors for future relationship dissolution: a population-based study of 18,523 couples
Published in
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00127-013-0681-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gun-Mette B. Røsand, Kari Slinning, Espen Røysamb, Kristian Tambs

Abstract

There has been a marked increase in divorce rates in most Western societies over the last 50 years. Relationship dissolution is associated with negative consequences both for adults and children, so it is important to understand the factors that help retain marital stability. The first aim of this prospective study was to identify risk factors for relationship dissolution in 18,523 couples in Norway, with a particular focus on individual dissatisfaction with the relationship. The second aim was to assess interaction effects between relationship dissatisfaction and other predictors of relationship dissolution.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 132 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 28 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 19%
Student > Master 19 14%
Researcher 11 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 31 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 68 50%
Social Sciences 10 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Unspecified 2 1%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 36 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 77. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2020.
All research outputs
#498,478
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#72
of 2,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,379
of 199,681 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#1
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,534 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,681 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.