You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Is coral bleaching really adaptive?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, February 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1038/415601a |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ove Hoegh-Guldberg, Ross J. Jones, Selina Ward, William K. Loh |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 52 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 28% |
| Researcher | 11 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
| Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 6 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 43% |
| Environmental Science | 12 | 22% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2013.
All research outputs
#5,849,361
of 22,703,044 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#60,839
of 90,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,470
of 123,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#195
of 340 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,703,044 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 90,718 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 99.2. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,386 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 340 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.