↓ Skip to main content

Highly Efficient Labeling of Human Lung Cancer Cells Using Cationic Poly-l-lysine-Assisted Magnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles

Overview of attention for article published in Nano-Micro Letters, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Highly Efficient Labeling of Human Lung Cancer Cells Using Cationic Poly-l-lysine-Assisted Magnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles
Published in
Nano-Micro Letters, July 2015
DOI 10.1007/s40820-015-0053-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xueqin Wang, Huiru Zhang, Hongjuan Jing, Liuqing Cui

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 28%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 17%
Student > Master 2 11%
Lecturer 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 2 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemical Engineering 2 11%
Materials Science 2 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Other 5 28%
Unknown 6 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2017.
All research outputs
#15,486,899
of 23,785,843 outputs
Outputs from Nano-Micro Letters
#229
of 1,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,105
of 263,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nano-Micro Letters
#7
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,785,843 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,042 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,796 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.