↓ Skip to main content

Cure frailty models for survival data: Application to recurrences for breast cancer and to hospital readmissions for colorectal cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Statistical Methods in Medical Research, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cure frailty models for survival data: Application to recurrences for breast cancer and to hospital readmissions for colorectal cancer
Published in
Statistical Methods in Medical Research, June 2011
DOI 10.1177/0962280210395521
Pubmed ID
Authors

Virginie Rondeau, Emmanuel Schaffner, Fabien Corbière, Juan R Gonzalez, Simone Mathoulin-Pélissier

Abstract

Owing to the natural evolution of a disease, several events often arise after a first treatment for the same subject. For example, patients with a primary invasive breast cancer and treated with breast conserving surgery may experience breast cancer recurrences, metastases or death. A certain proportion of subjects in the population who are not expected to experience the events of interest are considered to be 'cured' or non-susceptible. To model correlated failure time data incorporating a surviving fraction, we compare several forms of cure rate frailty models. In the first model already proposed non-susceptible patients are those who are not expected to experience the event of interest over a sufficiently long period of time. The other proposed models account for the possibility of cure after each event. We illustrate the cure frailty models with two data sets. First to analyse time-dependent prognostic factors associated with breast cancer recurrences, metastases, new primary malignancy and death. Second to analyse successive rehospitalizations of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer. Estimates were obtained by maximization of likelihood using SAS proc NLMIXED for a piecewise constant hazards model. As opposed to the simple frailty model, the proposed methods demonstrate great potential in modelling multivariate survival data with long-term survivors ('cured' individuals).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Uganda 1 1%
Unknown 64 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 27%
Researcher 12 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Student > Master 4 6%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 10 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 22 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 12 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2013.
All research outputs
#20,187,333
of 22,703,044 outputs
Outputs from Statistical Methods in Medical Research
#722
of 868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,255
of 111,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Statistical Methods in Medical Research
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,703,044 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 868 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,233 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.