↓ Skip to main content

Does Open Reduction of the Developmental Dislocated Hip Increase the Risk of Osteonecrosis?

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
Does Open Reduction of the Developmental Dislocated Hip Increase the Risk of Osteonecrosis?
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, June 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11999-011-1929-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Renata Pospischill, Julia Weninger, Rudolf Ganger, Johannes Altenhuber, Franz Grill

Abstract

Osteonecrosis (ON) of the femoral head is one of the main complications associated with treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hips (DDH). The reported rates of ON vary widely between 6% and 48%, suggesting varying factors in these studies influence the rate. Several studies suggest open reduction combined with femoral shortening provides protection against ON. However, it is unclear whether confounders such as failed Pavlik harness treatment, preliminary traction, closed versus open reduction, and redislocation influence the rate of ON.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Ukraine 1 2%
Unknown 56 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 14%
Student > Master 8 14%
Other 8 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 13 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 64%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 14 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2013.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#6,736
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,453
of 123,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#41
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,006 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.