↓ Skip to main content

Caveats on tomographic images

Overview of attention for article published in Terra Nova, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Caveats on tomographic images
Published in
Terra Nova, April 2013
DOI 10.1111/ter.12041
Authors

Gillian R. Foulger, Giuliano F. Panza, Irina M. Artemieva, Ian D. Bastow, Fabio Cammarano, John R. Evans, Warren B. Hamilton, Bruce R. Julian, Michele Lustrino, Hans Thybo, Tatiana B. Yanovskaya

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Iceland 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 130 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 22%
Professor 16 12%
Student > Master 13 9%
Other 10 7%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 16 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 106 77%
Engineering 2 1%
Physics and Astronomy 2 1%
Environmental Science 1 <1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 23 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2021.
All research outputs
#6,220,489
of 24,525,936 outputs
Outputs from Terra Nova
#76
of 442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,548
of 197,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Terra Nova
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,525,936 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 442 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,074 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them