↓ Skip to main content

Differences in the repertoire, regulation and function of Toll-like Receptors and inflammasome-forming Nod-like Receptors between human and mouse

Overview of attention for article published in Current Opinion in Microbiology, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Differences in the repertoire, regulation and function of Toll-like Receptors and inflammasome-forming Nod-like Receptors between human and mouse
Published in
Current Opinion in Microbiology, March 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.mib.2013.03.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juliana K Ariffin, Matthew J Sweet

Abstract

Ilya Metchnikoff's use of starfish larvae to discover phagocytosis, and Bruno Lemaitre's and Jules Hoffmann's identification of host defence functions for Drosophila Toll provide compelling examples of the utility of model organisms for discovery of human innate immune pathways. Bruce Beutler's mapping of lipopolysaccharide non-responsiveness in C3H/HeJ mice to the Toll-like Receptor 4 gene similarly highlights the power of the mouse as a model. Models have limitations however, and characterising the functional relevance of human innate immune responses not conserved in the mouse presents both a challenge and an opportunity. Here we review differences between human and mouse Toll-like Receptors and inflammasome-forming Nod-like Receptors in repertoire, regulation and function, highlighting the significance of these differences for human innate immunity.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 47 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 22%
Researcher 10 20%
Student > Master 8 16%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 6%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 7 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 42%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 10%
Mathematics 2 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 8 16%