↓ Skip to main content

Trespass, Animals and Democratic Engagement

Overview of attention for article published in Res Publica, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Trespass, Animals and Democratic Engagement
Published in
Res Publica, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11158-013-9214-x
Authors

Clare McCausland, Siobhan O’Sullivan, Scott Brenton

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 14%
Student > Master 2 14%
Librarian 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 2 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 3 21%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 21%
Social Sciences 3 21%
Computer Science 1 7%
Arts and Humanities 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2020.
All research outputs
#7,182,813
of 22,703,044 outputs
Outputs from Res Publica
#72
of 300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,616
of 197,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Res Publica
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,703,044 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 300 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them