↓ Skip to main content

Modified classification of surgical meshes for hernia repair based on the analyses of 1,000 explanted meshes

Overview of attention for article published in Hernia, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 1,275)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
31 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users
patent
6 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
157 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
Title
Modified classification of surgical meshes for hernia repair based on the analyses of 1,000 explanted meshes
Published in
Hernia, May 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10029-012-0913-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

U. Klinge, B. Klosterhalfen

Abstract

It is an undisputable fact that meshes have become standard for repair of abdominal wall hernias. Whereas in the late eighties there were only a couple of different devices available, today we have to choose among some hundreds, with lots of minor and major variations in polymer and structure. As most of the minor variations may not lead to significant change in clinical outcome and may be regarded as less relevant, we should focus on major differences. Eventually, this is used to structure the world of mesh by forming groups of textile devices with distinct biological response. Many experimental and some clinical studies have underlined the outstanding importance of porosity, which fortunately, in contrast to other biomechanical quanlities, is widely unaffected by the anisotropy of meshes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ireland 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 140 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 16%
Researcher 24 16%
Other 17 11%
Student > Master 14 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 8%
Other 36 24%
Unknown 22 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 75 50%
Engineering 23 15%
Materials Science 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 33 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 246. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2023.
All research outputs
#151,544
of 25,460,914 outputs
Outputs from Hernia
#4
of 1,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#615
of 176,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hernia
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,460,914 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,275 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.