You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of Pay for Performance on the Quality of Primary Care in England
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, July 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1056/nejmsa0807651 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephen M Campbell, David Reeves, Evangelos Kontopantelis, Bonnie Sibbald, Martin Roland |
| Abstract |
A pay-for-performance scheme based on meeting targets for the quality of clinical care was introduced to family practice in England in 2004. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 20% |
| France | 3 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 15% |
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| Finland | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 80% |
| Scientists | 2 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 591 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 14 | 2% |
| United States | 9 | 2% |
| Canada | 5 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Tunisia | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 551 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 95 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 89 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 89 | 15% |
| Other | 48 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 39 | 7% |
| Other | 157 | 27% |
| Unknown | 74 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 233 | 39% |
| Social Sciences | 55 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 45 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 39 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 35 | 6% |
| Other | 91 | 15% |
| Unknown | 93 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 115. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2023.
All research outputs
#369,826
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#5,578
of 32,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#854
of 127,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#19
of 182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.