↓ Skip to main content

Eye movements influence estimation of time-to-contact in prediction motion

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Brain Research, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
Title
Eye movements influence estimation of time-to-contact in prediction motion
Published in
Experimental Brain Research, September 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00221-010-2416-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon J. Bennett, Robin Baures, Heiko Hecht, Nicolas Benguigui

Abstract

In many situations, it is necessary to predict when a moving object will reach a given target even though the object may be partially or entirely occluded. Typically, one would track the moving object with eye movements, but it remains unclear whether ocular pursuit facilitates accurate estimation of time-to-contact (TTC). The present study examined this issue using a prediction-motion (PM) task in which independent groups estimated TTC in a condition that required fixation on the arrival location as an object approached, or a condition in which participants were instructed to pursue the moving object. The design included 15 TTC ranging from 0.4 to 1.5 s and three object velocities (2.5, 5, 10 deg/s). Both constant error and variable error in TTC estimation increased as a function of actual TTC. However, for the fixation group only, there was a significant effect of object velocity with a relative overestimation of TTC for the slower velocity and underestimation for the faster velocity. Further analysis indicated that the velocity effect exhibited by the fixation group was consistent with participants exhibiting a relatively constant misperception for each level of object velocity. Overall, these findings show that there is an advantage in the PM task to track the moving object with the eyes. We explain the different pattern of TTC estimation error exhibited when fixating and during pursuit with reference to differences in the available retinal and/or extra-retinal input.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Germany 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 90 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 25%
Student > Master 15 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 18 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 20 21%
Psychology 20 21%
Sports and Recreations 7 7%
Engineering 6 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 6%
Other 19 20%
Unknown 18 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2017.
All research outputs
#15,267,294
of 22,703,044 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Brain Research
#2,004
of 3,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,165
of 97,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Brain Research
#15
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,703,044 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,219 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.