↓ Skip to main content

Dynamics of microbial biomass and activity in five habitats of the Okefenokee Swamp ecosystem

Overview of attention for article published in Microbial Ecology, November 1987
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Dynamics of microbial biomass and activity in five habitats of the Okefenokee Swamp ecosystem
Published in
Microbial Ecology, November 1987
DOI 10.1007/bf02012941
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mary Ann Moran, A. E. Maccubbin, Ronald Benner, Robert E. Hodson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Austria 1 8%
Brazil 1 8%
Unknown 11 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 62%
Professor 2 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 62%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 31%
Environmental Science 1 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2016.
All research outputs
#7,491,592
of 22,899,952 outputs
Outputs from Microbial Ecology
#790
of 2,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,567
of 12,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbial Ecology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,899,952 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 12,707 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them