| Title |
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Improving Case-Based Ethics Training: How Modeling Behaviors and Forecasting Influence Effectiveness
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science and Engineering Ethics, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11948-013-9439-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lauren N. Harkrider, Alexandra E. MacDougall, Zhanna Bagdasarov, James F. Johnson, Michael D. Mumford, Shane Connelly, Lynn D. Devenport |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 11 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 2 | 17% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
| Librarian | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Philosophy | 2 | 17% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 17% |
| Psychology | 2 | 17% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 8% |
| Engineering | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2014.
All research outputs
#5,030,041
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Science and Engineering Ethics
#372
of 947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,774
of 202,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science and Engineering Ethics
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.