You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
&bgr;2-Adrenergic Receptor Stimulation Improves Endothelial Progenitor Cell–Mediated Ischemic Neoangiogenesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Circulation Research, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1161/circresaha.111.300152 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gennaro Galasso, Roberta De Rosa, Michele Ciccarelli, Daniela Sorriento, Carmine Del Giudice, Teresa Strisciuglio, Chiara De Biase, Rossella Luciano, Raffaele Piccolo, Adele Pierri, Giuseppe Di Gioia, Nella Prevete, Bruno Trimarco, Federico Piscione, Guido Iaccarino |
| Abstract |
Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) are present in the systemic circulation and home to sites of ischemic injury where they promote neoangiogenesis. β2-Adrenergic receptor (β2AR) plays a critical role in vascular tone regulation and neoangiogenesis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 32 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 18% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 24% |
| Unknown | 4 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 29% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 9% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 8 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2013.
All research outputs
#15,517,992
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Circulation Research
#6,077
of 7,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,727
of 309,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation Research
#43
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,667 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.