↓ Skip to main content

Common Genetic Polymorphisms Modify the Effect of Smoking on Absolute Risk of Bladder Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Research, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
111 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Common Genetic Polymorphisms Modify the Effect of Smoking on Absolute Risk of Bladder Cancer
Published in
Cancer Research, April 2013
DOI 10.1158/0008-5472.can-12-2388
Pubmed ID
Authors

Montserrat Garcia-Closas, Nathaniel Rothman, Jonine D. Figueroa, Ludmila Prokunina-Olsson, Summer S. Han, Dalsu Baris, Eric J. Jacobs, Nuria Malats, Immaculata De Vivo, Demetrius Albanes, Mark P. Purdue, Sapna Sharma, Yi-Ping Fu, Manolis Kogevinas, Zhaoming Wang, Wei Tang, Adonina Tardón, Consol Serra, Alfredo Carrato, Reina García-Closas, Josep Lloreta, Alison Johnson, Molly Schwenn, Margaret R. Karagas, Alan Schned, Gerald Andriole, Robert Grubb, Amanda Black, Susan M. Gapstur, Michael Thun, William Ryan Diver, Stephanie J. Weinstein, Jarmo Virtamo, David J. Hunter, Neil Caporaso, Maria Teresa Landi, Amy Hutchinson, Laurie Burdett, Kevin B. Jacobs, Meredith Yeager, Joseph F. Fraumeni, Stephen J. Chanock, Debra T. Silverman, Nilanjan Chatterjee

Abstract

Bladder cancer results from the combined effects of environmental and genetic factors, smoking being the strongest risk factor. Evaluating absolute risks resulting from the joint effects of smoking and genetic factors is critical to assess the public health relevance of genetic information. Analyses included up to 3,942 cases and 5,680 controls of European background in seven studies. We tested for multiplicative and additive interactions between smoking and 12 susceptibility loci, individually and combined as a polygenic risk score (PRS). Thirty-year absolute risks and risk differences by levels of the PRS were estimated for U.S. males aged 50 years. Six of 12 variants showed significant additive gene-environment interactions, most notably NAT2 (P = 7 × 10(-4)) and UGT1A6 (P = 8 × 10(-4)). The 30-year absolute risk of bladder cancer in U.S. males was 6.2% for all current smokers. This risk ranged from 2.9% for current smokers in the lowest quartile of the PRS to 9.9% for current smokers in the upper quartile. Risk difference estimates indicated that 8,200 cases would be prevented if elimination of smoking occurred in 100,000 men in the upper PRS quartile compared with 2,000 cases prevented by a similar effort in the lowest PRS quartile (P(additive) = 1 × 10(-4)). Thus, the potential impact of eliminating smoking on the number of bladder cancer cases prevented is larger for individuals at higher than lower genetic risk. Our findings could have implications for targeted prevention strategies. However, other smoking-related diseases, as well as practical and ethical considerations, need to be considered before any recommendations could be made.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
Spain 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 78 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 15%
Student > Master 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 5%
Other 16 19%
Unknown 18 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 19 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2013.
All research outputs
#17,683,485
of 22,703,044 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Research
#15,420
of 17,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,929
of 199,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Research
#228
of 255 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,703,044 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,844 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 255 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.