Title |
Time-dependent density functional theory for charge-transfer dynamics: review of the causes of failure and success*
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal de Physique I, November 2016
|
DOI | 10.1140/epjb/e2016-70110-y |
Authors |
Johanna I. Fuks |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 3 | 75% |
Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 4% |
France | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 23 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 8 | 32% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 28% |
Lecturer | 3 | 12% |
Student > Master | 1 | 4% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Unknown | 3 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemistry | 11 | 44% |
Physics and Astronomy | 6 | 24% |
Materials Science | 3 | 12% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 4 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2017.
All research outputs
#3,138,486
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal de Physique I
#158
of 1,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,691
of 317,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal de Physique I
#4
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,476 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.