↓ Skip to main content

IL‐1β, IL‐18, and eicosanoids promote neutrophil recruitment to pore‐induced intracellular traps following pyroptosis

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Immunology, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
127 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
IL‐1β, IL‐18, and eicosanoids promote neutrophil recruitment to pore‐induced intracellular traps following pyroptosis
Published in
European Journal of Immunology, October 2016
DOI 10.1002/eji.201646647
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ine Jorgensen, Joseph P. Lopez, Stefan A. Laufer, Edward A. Miao

Abstract

Inflammasomes activate caspase-1, initiating a lytic form of programmed cell death termed pyroptosis, which is an important innate immune defense mechanism against intracellular infections. We recently demonstrated in a mouse infection model of pyroptosis that instead of releasing bacteria into the extracellular space, bacteria remain trapped within the pyroptotic cell corpse, termed the pore-induced intracellular trap (PIT). This trapping mediates efferocytosis of the PIT and associated bacteria by neutrophils; bacteria are subsequently killed via neutrophil ROS. Using this pyroptosis model, we now show that the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β and IL-18 and inflammatory lipid mediators termed eicosanoids are required for effective clearance of bacteria downstream of pyroptosis. We further show that IL-1β, IL-18, and eicosanoids affect this in part by mediating neutrophil recruitment to the PIT. This is in addition to our prior findings that complement is also important to attract neutrophils. Thus, the PIT initiates a robust and coordinated innate immune response involving multiple mediators that attract neutrophils to efferocytose the PIT and its entrapped bacteria.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 1 1%
Unknown 91 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 23%
Student > Master 16 17%
Researcher 11 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Professor 5 5%
Other 16 17%
Unknown 17 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 32 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 13%
Linguistics 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 18 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2016.
All research outputs
#20,000,155
of 24,577,646 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Immunology
#6,328
of 6,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#245,937
of 321,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Immunology
#34
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,577,646 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,814 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,633 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.