↓ Skip to main content

Biofabrication: an overview of the approaches used for printing of living cells

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
patent
6 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
201 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
409 Mendeley
Title
Biofabrication: an overview of the approaches used for printing of living cells
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00253-013-4853-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cameron J. Ferris, Kerry G. Gilmore, Gordon G. Wallace, Marc in het Panhuis

Abstract

The development of cell printing is vital for establishing biofabrication approaches as clinically relevant tools. Achieving this requires bio-inks which must not only be easily printable, but also allow controllable and reproducible printing of cells. This review outlines the general principles and current progress and compares the advantages and challenges for the most widely used biofabrication techniques for printing cells: extrusion, laser, microvalve, inkjet and tissue fragment printing. It is expected that significant advances in cell printing will result from synergistic combinations of these techniques and lead to optimised resolution, throughput and the overall complexity of printed constructs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 409 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 4 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 394 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 101 25%
Student > Master 91 22%
Researcher 54 13%
Student > Bachelor 48 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 4%
Other 46 11%
Unknown 51 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 122 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 56 14%
Materials Science 41 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 6%
Chemistry 25 6%
Other 76 19%
Unknown 64 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2022.
All research outputs
#3,422,316
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#491
of 8,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,851
of 200,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#2
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,435 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.