↓ Skip to main content

The Influence of Stigma and Discrimination on Female Sex Workers’ Access to HIV Services in St. Petersburg, Russia

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS and Behavior, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
Title
The Influence of Stigma and Discrimination on Female Sex Workers’ Access to HIV Services in St. Petersburg, Russia
Published in
AIDS and Behavior, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10461-013-0447-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth J. King, Suzanne Maman, J. Michael Bowling, Kathryn E. Moracco, Viktoria Dudina

Abstract

Stigma associated with HIV and risk behaviors is known to be a barrier to health care access for many populations. Less is known about female sex workers (FSW) in Russia, a population that is especially vulnerable to HIV-infection, and yet hard-to-reach for service providers. We administered a questionnaire to 139 FSW to better understand how stigma and discrimination influence HIV service utilization. Logistic regression analysis indicated that HIV-related stigma is negatively associated with uptake of HIV testing, while sex work-related stigma is positively associated with HIV testing. HIV-positive FSW are more likely than HIV-negative FSW to experience discrimination in health care settings. While decreasing societal stigma should be a long-term goal, programs that foster inclusion of marginalized populations in Russian health care settings are urgently needed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 156 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 23%
Researcher 22 14%
Student > Bachelor 15 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 9%
Student > Postgraduate 10 6%
Other 27 17%
Unknown 34 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 28%
Social Sciences 26 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 11%
Psychology 10 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 2%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 40 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2021.
All research outputs
#1,957,434
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from AIDS and Behavior
#259
of 3,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,176
of 199,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS and Behavior
#3
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,531 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.