↓ Skip to main content

Effects of Aspirin on Endothelial Function and Hypertension

Overview of attention for article published in Current Hypertension Reports, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
Title
Effects of Aspirin on Endothelial Function and Hypertension
Published in
Current Hypertension Reports, October 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11906-016-0688-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mikhail S. Dzeshka, Alena Shantsila, Gregory Y. H. Lip

Abstract

Endothelial dysfunction is intimately related to the development of various cardiovascular diseases, including hypertension, and is often used as a target for pharmacological treatment. The scope of this review is to assess effects of aspirin on endothelial function and their clinical implication in arterial hypertension. Emerging data indicate the role of platelets in the development of vascular inflammation due to the release of proinflammatory mediators, for example, triggered largely by thromboxane. Vascular inflammation further promotes oxidative stress, diminished synthesis of vasodilators, proaggregatory and procoagulant state. These changes translate into vasoconstriction, impaired circulation and thrombotic complications. Aspirin inhibits thromboxane synthesis, abolishes platelets activation and acetylates enzymes switching them to the synthesis of anti-inflammatory substances. Aspirin pleiotropic effects have not been fully elucidated yet. In secondary prevention studies, the decrease in cardiovascular events with aspirin outweighs bleeding risks, but this is not the case in primary prevention settings. Ongoing trials will provide more evidence on whether to expand the use of aspirin or stay within current recommendations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 82 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 16%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Researcher 6 7%
Other 15 18%
Unknown 24 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 28%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 10%
Chemistry 8 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 28 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2022.
All research outputs
#4,646,859
of 25,199,971 outputs
Outputs from Current Hypertension Reports
#168
of 777 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,709
of 321,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Hypertension Reports
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,199,971 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 777 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,310 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.