↓ Skip to main content

Advancing a Conceptual Model of Evidence-Based Practice Implementation in Public Service Sectors

Overview of attention for article published in Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#32 of 726)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
6 policy sources
twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2120 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1872 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Advancing a Conceptual Model of Evidence-Based Practice Implementation in Public Service Sectors
Published in
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, December 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10488-010-0327-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gregory A. Aarons, Michael Hurlburt, Sarah McCue Horwitz

Abstract

Implementation science is a quickly growing discipline. Lessons learned from business and medical settings are being applied but it is unclear how well they translate to settings with different historical origins and customs (e.g., public mental health, social service, alcohol/drug sectors). The purpose of this paper is to propose a multi-level, four phase model of the implementation process (i.e., Exploration, Adoption/Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment), derived from extant literature, and apply it to public sector services. We highlight features of the model likely to be particularly important in each phase, while considering the outer and inner contexts (i.e., levels) of public sector service systems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,872 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 26 1%
United Kingdom 7 <1%
Mexico 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
India 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Other 5 <1%
Unknown 1822 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 305 16%
Researcher 289 15%
Student > Master 282 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 185 10%
Student > Bachelor 75 4%
Other 341 18%
Unknown 395 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 378 20%
Psychology 335 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 230 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 148 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 81 4%
Other 226 12%
Unknown 474 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,218,450
of 25,701,027 outputs
Outputs from Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
#32
of 726 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,753
of 192,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,701,027 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 726 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,715 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them