| Title |
Mixed-Methods Evaluation of a Telehealth Collaborative Care Program for Persons with HIV Infection in a Rural Setting
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-013-2385-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael Ohl, Dena Dillon, Jane Moeckli, Sarah Ono, Nancee Waterbury, Jo Sissel, Jun Yin, Brian Neil, Bonnie Wakefield, Peter Kaboli |
| Abstract |
Delivery of comprehensive care for persons with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in rural and low prevalence settings presents many challenges. We developed and evaluated a telehealth collaborative care (TCC) program for persons with HIV in a rural area. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 149 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 16% |
| Researcher | 20 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 9% |
| Other | 24 | 16% |
| Unknown | 33 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 10% |
| Psychology | 12 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 19 | 12% |
| Unknown | 43 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2014.
All research outputs
#14,544,541
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#5,374
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,490
of 198,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#45
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,225 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.