↓ Skip to main content

Dietary protein supplementation in the elderly for limiting muscle mass loss

Overview of attention for article published in Amino Acids, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#10 of 1,619)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
216 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
224 Mendeley
Title
Dietary protein supplementation in the elderly for limiting muscle mass loss
Published in
Amino Acids, November 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00726-016-2355-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antonio Herbert Lancha Jr., Rudyard Zanella Jr., Stefan Gleissner Ohara Tanabe, Mireille Andriamihaja, Francois Blachier

Abstract

Supplementation with whey and other dietary protein, mainly associated with exercise training, has been proposed to be beneficial for the elderly to gain and maintain lean body mass and improve health parameters. The main objective of this review is to examine the evidence provided by the scientific literature indicating benefit from such supplementation and to define the likely best strategy of protein uptake for optimal objectified results in the elderly. Overall, it appears that an intake of approximately 0.4 g protein/kg BW per meal thus representing 1.2-1.6 g protein/kg BW/day may be recommended taking into account potential anabolic resistance. The losses of the skeletal muscle mass contribute to lower the capacity to perform activities in daily living, emphasizing that an optimal protein consumption may represent an important parameter to preserve independence and contribute to health status. However, it is worth noting that the maximal intake of protein with no adverse effect is not known, and that high levels of protein intake is associated with increased transfer of protein to the colon with potential deleterious effects. Thus, it is important to examine in each individual case the benefit that can be expected from supplementation with whey protein, taking into account the usual protein dietary intake.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 216 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 224 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 223 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 20%
Student > Bachelor 32 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 9%
Researcher 15 7%
Professor 9 4%
Other 36 16%
Unknown 66 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 15%
Sports and Recreations 28 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 8%
Social Sciences 11 5%
Other 28 13%
Unknown 72 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 170. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2020.
All research outputs
#243,233
of 25,793,330 outputs
Outputs from Amino Acids
#10
of 1,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,677
of 318,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Amino Acids
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,793,330 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,619 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,306 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.