↓ Skip to main content

Medication use among Australian adults with intellectual disability in primary healthcare settings: A cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Medication use among Australian adults with intellectual disability in primary healthcare settings: A cross-sectional study
Published in
Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, April 2013
DOI 10.3109/13668250.2013.778968
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tan N. Doan, Nicholas G. Lennox, Miriam Taylor-Gomez, Robert S. Ware

Abstract

There is concern about widespread medication use by people with intellectual disability (ID), especially psychotropic and anticonvulsant agents. However, there is sparse information on prescribing patterns in Australia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 62 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 14%
Student > Master 9 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 13%
Researcher 7 11%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 10 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 17 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Social Sciences 5 8%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 13 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2013.
All research outputs
#18,333,600
of 22,703,044 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability
#270
of 320 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,459
of 199,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,703,044 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 320 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.