↓ Skip to main content

Commonly preserved and species-specific gyral folding patterns across primate brains

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Structure and Function, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Commonly preserved and species-specific gyral folding patterns across primate brains
Published in
Brain Structure and Function, October 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00429-016-1329-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiao Li, Hanbo Chen, Tuo Zhang, Xiang Yu, Xi Jiang, Kaiming Li, Longchuan Li, Mir Jalil Razavi, Xianqiao Wang, Xintao Hu, Junwei Han, Lei Guo, Xiaoping Hu, Tianming Liu

Abstract

Cortical folding pattern analysis is very important to understand brain organization and development. Since previous studies mostly focus on human brain cortex, the regularity and variability of cortical folding patterns across primate brains (macaques, chimpanzees and human) remain largely unknown. This paper presents a novel computational framework to identify common or unique gyral folding patterns in macaque, chimpanzee and human brains using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data. We quantitatively characterize gyral folding patterns via hinge numbers with cortical surfaces constructed from MRI data, and identify 6 common three-hinge gyral folds that exhibit consistent anatomical locations across these three species as well as 2 unique three hinges in macaque, 6 ones in chimpanzee and 14 ones in human. A novel morphology descriptor is then applied to classify three-hinge gyral folds, and the increasing complexity is identified among the species analyzed. This study may provide novel insights into the regularity and variability of the cerebral cortex from developmental perspective and may potentially facilitate novel neuroimage analyses such as cortical parcellation with correspondences across species in the future.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 26%
Researcher 7 23%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Master 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 6 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 9 29%
Computer Science 4 13%
Engineering 3 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 8 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2018.
All research outputs
#16,454,538
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Brain Structure and Function
#1,015
of 1,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,226
of 316,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Structure and Function
#19
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,725 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.