You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
慢性疼痛における血液中の脳由来神経栄養因子BDNFの役割
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Japan Society of Pain Clinicians, November 2016
|
| DOI | 10.11321/jjspc.15-0039 |
| Authors |
廣瀬 宗孝, 助永 憲比古, 岡野 一郎, 岡野 紫, 中野 範, 恒遠 剛示, 棚田 大輔, 佐藤 和美, 乾 貴絵 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2017.
All research outputs
#4,300,878
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Japan Society of Pain Clinicians
#7
of 106 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,057
of 317,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Japan Society of Pain Clinicians
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 106 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,847 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them