Introduction: In the adjuvant setting for cervical cancer, classical risk factors for postoperative radiochemotherapy have been established. However, data on laboratory changes during therapy and the prognostic value of serological markers are limited and further knowledge is needed to optimize the toxic trimodal regimen. Methods: We retrospectively identified 69 women who underwent weekly postoperative radiochemotherapy with 40 mg/m2 of cisplatin for cervical cancer between 2010 and 2021 at a single center. Laboratory parameters were recorded before, at each cycle and after radiochemotherapy. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank analyses were used to calculate and compare survival, groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney U, χ2, and variance tests. Results: With a median follow-up of 17.7 months, the 1- and 5-year local control rates were 94.0% and 73.7%, respectively, with significantly better rates for more chemotherapy cycles and negative resection margins. Only 68.1% of patients completed all cycles. The most common reasons for early discontinuation were persistent asymptomatic leukopenia in women aged ≤ 50 years, and limiting infections in women aged > 50 years. Leukopenia was more likely to occur after the third cycle. Significantly worse survival was observed for post-radiochemotherapy elevated C-reactive-protein and lactate dehydrogenase levels, low pre-radiochemotherapy nutritional index, and raised C-reactive-protein-levels; the latter were also predictable for local control. The Glasgow prognostic score did not reliably predict survival. Conclusion: Incomplete application of simultaneous chemotherapy leads to inferior local control, and age-dependent limiting factors should be identified at an early stage. In addition to classical risk factors, serological markers (C-reactive-protein, lactate dehydrogenase, nutritional index) show prognostic significance.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2022.
All research outputs
#21,954,040
of 27,791,073 outputs
Outputs from Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment
#1,113
of 1,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#309,755
of 440,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment
#24
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,791,073 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,685 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
