↓ Skip to main content

Self-Reported Losses Versus Actual Losses in Online Gambling: An Empirical Study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Gambling Studies, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
Title
Self-Reported Losses Versus Actual Losses in Online Gambling: An Empirical Study
Published in
Journal of Gambling Studies, November 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10899-016-9648-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Auer, Mark D. Griffiths

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 70 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 15%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Lecturer 4 6%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 24 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 19 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 10%
Social Sciences 6 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 4%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 27 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2016.
All research outputs
#5,374,479
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gambling Studies
#258
of 1,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,944
of 319,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gambling Studies
#6
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,023 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,860 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.