↓ Skip to main content

Predicting vitamin D deficiency in older Australian adults

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Endocrinology, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Predicting vitamin D deficiency in older Australian adults
Published in
Clinical Endocrinology, April 2013
DOI 10.1111/cen.12203
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bich Tran, Bruce K. Armstrong, Kevin McGeechan, Peter R. Ebeling, Dallas R. English, Michael G. Kimlin, Robyn Lucas, Jolieke C. van der Pols, Alison Venn, Val Gebski, David C. Whiteman, Penelope M. Webb, Rachel E. Neale

Abstract

There has been a dramatic increase in vitamin D testing in Australia in recent years, prompting calls for targeted testing. We sought to develop a model to identify people most at risk of vitamin D deficiency.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 48 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Other 4 8%
Student > Master 4 8%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 15 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 16 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2013.
All research outputs
#16,699,002
of 24,558,777 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Endocrinology
#1,990
of 2,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,824
of 202,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Endocrinology
#50
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,558,777 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,922 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,471 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.